At the beginning of the first TOEFL Writing task, you will read an academic passage that tackles three main claims and is 250-300 words long. Next, you will listen to a lecture where a professor disagrees with one of the claims. Your job here is to write an essay explaining the claims and how the speaker is challenging them. Here is the precise structure:
- Reading time: 3 minutes.
- Lecture length: About 2 minutes.
- Response time: 20 minutes.
Unlike the TOEFL Independent Writing task, where you give your own opinion, TOEFL Integrated Writing topics require you to summarize opinions that you read and hear. This first task in TOEFL Writing really is all about note-taking, paraphrasing, and reporting. Read on to learn all about TOEFL Writing Task 1!
The Integrated task from the TOEFL writing section includes a passage and an audio lecture on an academic topic. You have three minutes to read the passage and two minutes to listen to the lecture. The task requires you to obtain the key points and write an essay according to the question.
The TOEFL writing topics for this task are mostly taken from subjects like science, social science, psychology, and others. You can expect these types of questions below in task 1 of the TOEFL writing test:
TOEFL Integrated Writing Task 1
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 1
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Sea otters are a small mammal that lives in the waters along North America’s west coast from California to Alaska. A few years ago some of the sea otter populations off of the Alaskan coast started to decline rapidly and raised several concerns because of their important role in the coastal ecosystem. Experts began investigating and came up with two possible explanations. One explanation was environmental pollution and the second was attacks by predators.
At first it seemed as if the pollution was the most likely cause for the population decline. One reason pollution was more likely was because of the known pollution sources along the Alaskan coast such as oil rigs. Also water samples taken in the area showed increased levels of chemicals that could decrease the otters’ immune systems and indirectly result in their deaths.
Another thing that pointed to pollution as the culprit was the decline of other sea mammals such as seals in the same areas. This indicated that whatever was affecting the otters was also affecting the other sea mammals. Environmental pollution usually affects an entire ecosystem instead of just one species. Only predators that occurred in a large area, such as orcas (a large predatory whale), could cause the same effect, but they usually hunt larger prey.
Finally, scientists believed the pollution hypothesis would also explain the uneven pattern of otter decline. In some Alaskan locations the otter population declined greatly while other populations remained stable. Some experts suggested this could be explained by ocean currents, or other environmental factor, might have created uneven concentrations of pollutants along the coast.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the decline in sea otter populations. While the reading’s author states that pollution is a cause of their populations declining, the lecturer suggests that the greatest factor is predation. The lecturer casts doubts on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, higher levels of pollutants in water samples support the pollution theory. However, the lecturer disputes this by explaining that if sea otters had been killed by pollutants in water, their remains would appear on shores, which indicates predators ate the sea otters.
Secondly, the reading states that populations of other small sea animals have been hurt by pollution. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He argues that because the whale population decreased, nearby orcas had to eat otters instead.
Finally, the reading claims that pollutant concentration can explain the uneven pattern of diminishing sea otter populations. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that this uneven population decline corresponds with the prevalence of orcas in different areas. He thinks that the otter population declines more in places with orcas, and less in those inaccessible to orcas.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture both concern hypotheses about diminishing sea otter populations, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 2
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Although it’s a new technology, solar energy provides benefits to the entire world. First, solar energy eliminates our reliance on non-renewable fossil fuels. Additionally, solar energy is non-pollutant, which makes it better for everyone. Finally, there is almost no maintenance as solar panels have a long life span without regular maintenance. So, the benefits seem to be overwhelmingly positive and supportive of further production.
The first benefit is the ability for solar energy to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Many sources of energy are renewable only over millions of years. Unfortunately, humans consume those faster than they are produced. Solar energy could be a replacement for non-renewable sources as a perpetual source of energy. Thus solar energy can become a new energy with no legitimate fear of overproduction.
Another benefit is the non-pollutant aspect of solar energy. Burning fossil fuels is known to produce deadly pollution, while solar energy produces zero harmful byproducts. While current energy sources produce disgusting smells, sounds, and visuals, solar energy produces nothing offensive. Therefore, when considering the health of the planet, the lifelong health benefits of solar energy are unparalleled.
Finally, solar energy has low costs. The cost of solar panels is a one-time purchase. Also, after installation, the lifespan of a solar panel is thirty years. After the initial cost, the solar panel will cost almost nothing. This is a benefit to personal finances, but also peace of mind since there is no worry about rising prices or lack of resources.
In conclusion, these benefits provide support for more people to consider switching to solar power. Both the renewable aspect as well as the non-polluting aspect means that there will be added benefits for individuals, cities, and the planet. The low lifelong cost of installation and maintenance provides a lifetime of benefits. Thus, solar energy looks to be one of the world’s great ideas.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they address the specific ideas about solar energy described in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about solar energy. The reading passage explores the many supports for the use of solar energy. The lecture then builds on those ideas and presents further information about the benefits of solar energy.
First of all, according to the reading, the usage of solar energy will reduce the dependency on fossil fuels like oil. It also emphasizes, that there are no limitations on the energy, and so it’s a good alternative to old energy sources. The lecture then goes on to explain that although the production of solar panels needs a lot of energy, it’s gained back after 5 years after production. Therefore, in the long run, solar panels make up for the energy used in making them.
Secondly, the reading says solar panels can be used in many ways. This is supported by the lecture through the examples of people controlling their energy instead of just relying on the energy company to do it for them. Also, it says that people controlling their own energy limits wast.
Thirdly, the reading passage also gives information about the advantages of costs. You only have to buy the panels at the beginning, but there are fewer maintenance costs in the next years. The lecturer also underlines this advantage by mentioning additional positive tax effects, which offset the cost of installation. Moreover, people can even make money by creating excess energy and then selling it to other people.
In conclusion, the reading passage and the lecture are both about solar energy. They both emphasize the advantages of solar energy because of the renewability characteristic of the energy, the avoidance of pollution, and also some financial benefits like less maintenance and positive tax effects.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 3
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
The settlements of New Mexico’s Chaco Canyon in the American Southwest were notable for their massive stone buildings, known as great houses, containing hundreds of rooms and standing three or four stories high since the twelfth century A.D. Archeologists have been trying to determine how these buildings were used but still have not come up with a universally agreed-upon explanation. However, there are three competing theories that provide plausible explanations.
One theory states the Chaco structures were residential and held hundreds of people. Supporters of this theory look too similar architectural structures in more recent Southwest societies. One structure, in particular, that is strikingly similar to the Chaco buildings is the apartment building at Taos, New Mexico, which has housed several people of the centuries.
The second theory argues that the Chaco structures were used as food storage facilities. Since one of the main crops of the Chaco people was grain maize, it could be stored for an extended time period without spoiling. The large size of the structures made them ideal for storing large crops of maize.
A third theory proposes the houses were used as ceremonial gathering places. Archeologists discovered a large mound of old material near one house called Pueblo Alto. Further inspection of the mound revealed deposits containing several broken pots. It has been documented in other Native American cultures that during special ceremonies they ate a festive meal and discarded the pots that the meal had been prepared or served with. Because of these documented ceremonies, the finding at Pueblo Alto has been interpreted as evidence that people gathered there for special ceremonies.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In the reading passage, the author presents three theories to explain the primary function of some large houses found in Chaco Canyon. However, the lecturer points out the inaccuracies in each of the theories with three separate pieces of conflicting evidence.
First, the author points out similarities between the Chaco houses and other large residential structures, and argues that they may have been residential. However, the lecturer disputes this point. To disprove this idea, the lecturer discusses the lack of a sufficient number of fireplaces for a living space relative to the size of the structure.
Secondly, the author of the reading suggests that the houses may have been used for food storage due to their large size. The lecturer disagrees with this point, stating that it is unlikely the buildings were used for food storage. He explains that there would be more traces of scattered maize in the Chaco Canyon houses if they were used for this purpose.
Finally, the author in the reading proposes that the structures were used for ceremonial purposes. The author bases this claim the evidence of some pots found in the area. The lecturer argues that the pots found near the great houses are not sufficient proof that the houses were used as ceremonial gathering places. Moreover, the lecture explains the pots found in the mound were likely discarded by construction workers when the houses were completed.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the purpose of the Chaco Canyon houses, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 4
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
New Zealand, located in the southwestern Pacific Ocean, is an island country that geographically comprises two main landmasses, North Island (Te Ika-a-Māui) and South Island (Te Waipounamu), and several smaller islands. There is evidence that the first inhabitants of New Zealand moved there around 1300 C.E.
One piece of evidence is the indigenous Polynesion people of New Zealand, the Māori, who originated from settlers arriving in waves of canoe voyages from eastern Polynesia. Over several centuries of isolation on the islands, the Polynesian settlers developed their own culture that would become known as the Māori. They formed their own language, rich mythology, and distinctive crafts and performing arts. Historically the Māori contains 24-27 generations. If each generation averaged approximately 25 years apart then by calculating the number of years multiplied by the number of generation the Māori moved to New Zealand around 1300 C.E.
Also, a pollen study shows that trees were replaced by the grass around this time period which would not be caused by forest fires. Therefore it is concluded that it was a result of primitive agriculture and must be of human origin.
Finally, artifact have been dated using radiocarbon dating and show evidence of human occupation from around 1288 C.E. to 1300 C.E. Radiocarbon dating determines the age of an object by using the properties of radiocarbon, a radioactive isotope of carbon, to determine how old an object is depending on how much radiocarbon is still present. By using this process, scientists are able to give an estimate of when something originally existed.
Transcript of the lecture:
Professor
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and lecture concern the first human inhabitants of New Zealand, known as the Maori. The reading presents and analyzes information about their origins. But in light of new findings, the lecturer believes analysis is not completely accurate. He provides three pieces of evidence contradicting points in the reading.
The first point from the reading concerns the population of New Zealand, in which it is suggested that the Maori were the first human inhabitants of the island. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this conclusion. He states that being able to track how long the Maori have been in New Zealand does not prove that there wasn’t a group of people occupying the islands before them.
Next, the reading presents the argument that evidence of fires shows that humans burned native forests for agriculture. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this by mentioning the frequency of naturally occurring fires. Moreover, he feels that this evidence does little to prove the length of human occupation in New Zealand.
Third, the reading discusses the discovery of an object that indicates human occupation at the time of approximately 1300 C.E.. Nevertheless, the lecturer points out that rat bones dating to a time before the Maori occupied the islands have also been found. He concludes that the Maori did not bring the non-native species from other areas of Polynesia and implicates other early human ancestors were the ones responsible.
In conclusion, while the reading and lecture each discuss the possibility of the Maori people having been the first inhabitants of New Zealand, the lecturer effectively challenges all three points made in the reading.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 5
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Mima mounds are low, flattened, domelike mounds composed of loose unstratified sediment as an over-thickened topsoil (A Horizon). These mounds come in many sizes of mound and groups of mounds. There are three theories on how Mima mounds originated.
The first theory is that they are made by Native Americans. There have been records of similar structures being created by Native Americans during burial rites. Because of the similarities in the structure, it was concluded that the Mima mounds were made by Native Americans.
A second theory is they were created by a major earthquake. Seismic activity generates vibrations through the earth that can move sediment and loose soil. This is concluded based on the loose structure of the soil in the Mima mounds.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture present some conflicting information about the nature of Mima Mounds. While the reading presents certain information about the possible creation of these unusual mounds, the professor presents three contradictory pieces of information intended to disprove the points made in the reading.
First, the reading proposes that the Mima Mounds were built by Native Americans because they resemble other similar mounds that were also constructed by Native Americans. However, the professor does not believe these similarities alone are enough to prove this claim. He says that the mounds contain no human remnants, and therefore there is no way to verify their origin.
Next, the reading proposes that the mounds could have resulted from earthquakes. The lecturer also casts doubt on this conclusion, pointing out that the particular location where the mounds were found has had few earthquakes throughout history. Moreover, he feels that this fact makes it unlikely that seismic activity was responsible for the mounds’ formation.
Lastly, the reading states that the mounds could have been built by gophers, as these animals have created similar mounds elsewhere. The professor admits that the mounds look similar, but disputes this argument, citing a lack of available information. Furthermore, he believes that it is possible that the gophers simply moved into the existing mounds.
Therefore, the professor finds ways to disprove each of the propositions as absolutes. He does this by showing that the information which supports each idea from the reading is incomplete.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 6
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
The Ordovician period is a geologic period that occurred around 440-485 million years ago and lasted for approximately 45 million years. During this time period, the oceans teemed with life. Life on land was still in the early stages of diversification. This period came to an end after a series of extinction events that created the second-largest major extinction in Earth’s history. There are several possible explanations for the cause of the mass extinction of marine life at the end of the Ordovician period. The following three reasons are the most likely.
First, when the climate cooled significantly ice sheets formed causing the sea level to drop by as much as 100m. This destroyed the habitat of species living in the shallow oceans. It also spelled disaster for species that were adapted to warmer waters and could not survive the cooler conditions that created the ice sheets.
A second theory is that the impact of a meteorite caused the mass extinction. The dust created from such an impact would be enough to completely block out the sun. Since many organisms, especially those near the ocean surface, relied on sunlight as part of their survival then the complete blocking of the sun would be devastating to these creatures.
The third theory is super UV rays. This theory states the sun’s ultraviolet rays were very strong and killed marine organisms living on the ocean surface. Fossils found showing the disappearance of one kind of marine life on the ocean surface provides evidence for this theory.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture present some conflicting ideas about what caused the mass extinction of animals during the Ordovician period. While the reading suggests three potential explanations for this event, the lecture casts doubt on each of these explanations by providing three counterpoints.
The first idea proposed in the reading is that the Ice Age created large ice sheets, cooling the water, and lowering the water level by almost 100m. However, the lecturer states that this process would have taken thousands of years, making it too slow to be a viable explanation. Moreover, he believes that the long duration of this process would have allowed for animal adaptation to occur, thus saving them from going extinct in the first place.
Second, the reading suggests that a meteor hitting Earth could have caused an extinction by blocking out the sun with dust. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this point by explaining that a meteor would have left behind a crater and a radium deposit, neither of which exist from that time period.
Third, the reading brings up evidence from a fossil which indicates that higher UV rays caused the extinction by killing animals in shallow water. Nevertheless, the lecturer explains that the fossil is from a creature that is still on Earth. Furthermore, he believes that this explanation does not accurately take into account where the fossilized animal lived.
In conclusion, the reading and the lecture both concern the question of what caused the Ordovician mass extinction, but the ideas brought forth in the reading are effectively called into question through points made by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 7
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
North America is a continent that is completely within the Northern Hemisphere and almost entirely in the Western Hemisphere. It is the third-largest continent and has the fourth-largest population in the world. It was previously thought that the first people to reach North America were Asians, but new evidence has shown that they were actually Europeans.
First, scientists found spear points of similar shape and style in both Europe and North America. These spear points were large and fashioned like a sharp blades. In contrast, the spear points found in Asia are very small and don’t share many similarities.
Also, European bones have been found that can prove the earliest people were European. Bones analyzed from a 24,700-year-old skeleton of a child have provided DNA that was able to be extracted showing genes found primarily in European humans.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture both concern the question of where the first North Americans came from, as new science suggests that they may have come from Europe rather than Asia. The reading presents three possible arguments to explain how this could have been possible, whereas the lecturer attempts to refute all three of these points.
The first explanation given in the reading is that spear points found in North America resemble those found in Europe, but not Asia. The lecture refutes this idea by saying that the similar shape is not due to inheritance, but instead can be explained by the fact that humans in both North America and Europe were hunting large animals.
The second point from the reading is that bones found in North America share European DNA as opposed to Asian DNA. The lecture points out that while that’s true, there are other bones that are not of European descent. Moreover, he states that only 33% of the bones found were of European descent.
The third point in the reading is that the ice shelf formed during the previous Ice Age would have allowed Europeans to walk from France to North America. However, the lecturer disagrees, saying that Europeans had no sailing capabilities at the time of the Ice Age. Furthermore, he feels that the journey as proposed in the reading would have been nearly impossible on foot.
In conclusion, the reading presents some interesting hypotheses about where North Americans came from. However, the lecture brings to light three interesting counterpoints to disprove these explanations.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 8
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Diprotodon is the largest known marsupial to have ever lived. It was a member of a group of unusual species known as the “Australian megafauna” and existed around 1.6 million years ago. The largest specimens discovered were as large as a current-day hippopotamus. There are many conflicting theories about when the diprotodon became extinct, these times range from 28,000 to 46,000 years ago. There have been three theories suggested for the mass extinction of the species.
The first theory is that fire set by humans caused them to become extinct. It is believed that early Aborigines would use fire to manage the land and drive game. This could have caused the diprotodon to lose its home and environment. With less land to have a natural environment undisturbed by humans, there was less room for them to live.
A second theory is that they were hunted to extinction by humans. Fossils found with what appear to be butchering marks support this theory. Other support for the theory comes from other places where overhunting led to the extinction of megafauna such as in New Zealand and Madagascar.
Finally, the third theory for the extinction of the diprotodon was a cold and dry climate. Around the proposed times of the extinction of the diprotodon was when an ice age was occurring. An ice age is a long period of reduction in the temperature of the Earth’s surface and atmosphere, resulting in the expansion of ice sheets and glaciers. It is possible that diprotodon went extinct because of the temperature drop during the ice age.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are concerned with the causes of the extinction of the diprotodon a creature that lived in Australia. This was the largest marsupial to ever live, about the size of a modern Hippopotamus.
The first suggestion in the reading is that humans cleared the lands that the diprotodon lived on so that they could farm. However, the lecture proposes that this is false because Australia is too large for the Aborigines to have cleared so much land. Also, the soil isn’t fertile enough to have justified clearing the land in the first place.
Next, the reading suggests that the creatures were hunted into extinction. While the lecture doesn’t directly refute this idea, it does suggest that there were a large number of animals for hunting. Therefore, there just isn’t enough evidence that they would have had to hunt this animal and caused its extinction.
The final suggestion is that an ice age caused the extinction. However, the lecture points out that there is no evidence that this ice age was different than others the diprotodon had lived through. So it wouldn’t make sense that this would kill it.
Both the reading and the lecture agree that something causes the extinction of the diprotodon and that some of these ideas are possible. However, the lecture shows that not enough information is known at this time.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 9
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
There are many paintings attributed to Rembrandt, the most famous seventeenth-century Dutch painter, but there are doubts that some of the paintings are truly by him. One such painting is “Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet” which was attributed to Rembrandt because of its style. The representation of the woman’s face is very similar other portraits painted by Rembrandt, but there are problems that suggest it might not be a work by Rembrandt.
First, the clothing of the woman is inconsistent. She is wearing a white linen cap, like that of a servant, but her coat has a luxurious fur collar that would be worn by a wealthy member of society. Being known for his attention to detail, this is not something Rembrandt would have done.
Second, the lighting within the painting are not consistent with Rembrandt’s style. He was known as the master of painting light and shadow, but in the painting light is reflected up onto the face, even though the collar below is a dark color which would have absorbed the light. Due to the darkness of the collar, the face should have been partially in shadow. Again this is not an error that Rembrandt would make.
Finally, the painting was revealed to have been painted on a panel of wood pieces glued together. Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, but he was not known to use more than one piece of wood. Due to these inconsistencies, the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage
The reading and the lecture both question if Rembrandt painted “Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet.” Whereas the author of the reading states that it was not Rembrandt, the lecture suggests otherwise. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading with three reasons.
First, the reading states that inconsistencies in the subject’s clothing conflict with Rembrandt’s attention to detail. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument by explaining that a fur collar was painted over in an attempt to increase its value.
Secondly, according to the reading, the light and shadows were inconsistent in the painting. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that in the original painting, the subject’s face would have been illuminated by the light collar that was painted over. In this context, the painting matches with Rembrandt’s work.
Finally, the reading claims that the wood panel behind the painting is actually made of multiple pieces of wood, which was abnormal for Rembrandt. Additionally, the lecturer claims that the wood panel was enlarged, while the original was on a single panel. Furthermore, he mentions that the wood is from the same tree as another Rembrandt painting.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the controversy surrounding this particular painting, the the lecturer refutes all three main points made in the reading.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 10
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
A bust is a sculpted or cast representation of the upper part of the human figure normally supported by a plinth. These forms are in likeness to an individual and can be created from any medium such as marble, bronze, terracotta, or wood. One such bust found in a river in France is considered to be the 50-year-old self-statue of Julius Caesar based on the following three reasons.
First, the style of the bust found in the river was realism, a style of art attempting to represent subject matter truthfully, which was a prevalent art style of the time. This lines up with the time period that the statue is believed to have been created in.
Second, the bust resembles other works of Julius Caesar. The hair line is very similar to that of the image on coins depicting him. Because of the resemblance between known images of Julius Caesar it is probably his 50-year-old self-statue.
And finally, people of this time period often buried this bust in order to show reverence for Julius Caesar. This was due to the unfortunate circumstances of his demise and how many people had respected him as a political official.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In response to the reading, the lecturer presents new conclusions that have been drawn about a bust of Julius Caesar found in France. While the reading suggests it was made in the time of Caesar, the lecturer explains why this is probably not the case.
First, the lecturer agrees that realism was a prevalent art style during the life of Julius Caesar; however, it was also a prevalent style of art throughout many eras of human history. Since realism has been a style of art in many periods, this information does little to prove the date of the bust.
Additionally, while the reading references the similarities in the hairline of the bust with that of Roman coins of the time, the lecturer notices some differences. He explains that the nose on the bust is different from the coins. If one feature is the same, it is reasonable to expect that all the features would be identical, but they are not. Thus, the bust is probably not an exact representation.
Last, while some people may have buried statues of Julius Caesar out of reverence, this may not be true for all buried things. The lecturer gives the example of a statue of Napoleon that was through by a river because it was seen as waste, not because someone revered Napoleon. So, it’s possibly just an accident instead of intentional reverence.
Therefore, the lecturer describes how the evidence from the reading is circumstantial and not absolutely true. The style of art could be from any era, the features of the face don’t match all styles, and the notion of burying something versus casting it aside is cloudy. Thus the date of the bust remains in question rather than being definitive.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 11
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
In a vote that took place at the International Astronomical Union Conference on August 24th, 2006, Pluto lost its status as a planet in our solar system. Pluto was originally discovered in 1930 when scientists were searching for something that was interfering with Uranus’s orbit. Though Pluto was estimated to be similar in size to Earth, it was later discovered that it was even smaller than our own moon, as well as many other moons. It is now known that there are thousands of planetary objects similar to Pluto, including Eris which is slightly larger than Pluto. Choosing to reclassify Pluto to a dwarf planet honors the fact that science is about making new discoveries. While it was a sad day for Pluto lovers, people in general have accepted the idea, and the next generation of children will grow up knowing only eight planets and thinking nothing of it. As Mike Brown, the astronomer who discovered Eris, noted following the IUC’s decision, “Science is self-correcting.”
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points made in the lecture, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading passage.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 12
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Endotherms are animals that maintain a constant body temperature no matter what the external temperature is. Humans are an example of an endotherm because they maintain a constant internal temperature of 37°C independent of external temperatures. Since modern reptiles are not endotherms, it is assumed that dinosaurs were not endotherms either because they are reptiles. However, dinosaurs were different in many ways from modern reptiles and there is considerable evidence that they were endotherms.
One piece of evidence is the existence of polar dinosaurs. Dinosaur fossils discovered in polar regions support the endotherm theory about dinosaurs because only animals capable of maintaining an internal temperature of the surrounding environment could be active in such a frigid climate.
A second piece of evidence is the connection between the position and movement of the legs and endothermy. The physiology of endothermy allows sustained physical activity. An example of these kinds of sustained physical activities is running. Running is only efficient if the animal’s legs are positioned underneath its body like in all modern endotherms and in dinosaurs. This leg placement strongly suggests that dinosaurs were endotherms.
Finally, there is the connection between endothermy and bone structure. Canals that house nerves and blood vessels or rapid body growth called Haversian Canals are usually found in the bones of endotherms. The presence of these canals is a strong indication that the animal is an endotherm, and they have been found in the fossilized bones of dinosaurs.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture both concern the question of dinosaurs being endotherms. While the author of the reading attempts to support this idea, the professor in the lecture contradicts those statements with three reasons.
First, the reading claims that the existence of polar dinosaurs could prove that they were endotherms, whereas the professor points out that in the time of the dinosaurs those regions were not as cold as they are today. In addition, the lecturer mentions that during harsh winters polar dinosaurs could migrate to warmer climates.
Second, the lecturer disproves the idea in the reading of dinosaurs’ leg position and movement being evidence to classify them as endotherms. She states that dinosaurs had legs positioned under their bodies to support their massive size. Moreover, she states that being similar to endotherms is not evidence to support dinosaurs actually being endotherms.
Third, the reading addresses the presence of Haversian canals in dinosaurs. Although the professor acknowledges this point, she also points out evidence of growth rings seen in the dinosaur fossils indicating that dinosaurs weren’t continuously growing. She feels that this pattern is a characteristic of non-endothermic animals.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture both discuss the possibility of dinosaurs being endothermic, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture both concern hypotheses about diminishing sea otter populations, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 13
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Antlers are extensions of the skull grown by members of the deer and antelope family. They are bone structures usually found in symmetrical pairs and, in most species, are only grown by the males of the species. Antlers have several functions such as fighting or attracting females. The following are three of the functions of antlers.
First, antlers can help with heat dissipation. The horns have been shown to contain vascular tissue and the large surface area of the antlers versus the amount of blood flowing through the tissues allows for the blood to cool before returning to the rest of the body.
Second, antlers are used as a defense against predators. Antlers are used in male-male fights it stands to reason that they would use them to defend against other threats. When cornered by a predator and forced to fight, the antlered animal can use them to fend off the attacking animal.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecturer calls into question the role of antlers in everything from biological functions to demonstrating strength and fertility. The reading presents a few possible uses of the antler, but the lecturer refutes each of them in order.
First, the reading argues that the antlers are used for heat dissipation. However, the lecturer shows that if that were true then the antlers wouldn’t grow in the winter and yet they do. Also, deer in warm climates actually have smaller antlers than those in cold climates. So it would seem like the antlers don’t help with heat dissipation.
Second, the reading suggests that antlers are used for defensive purposes. While they may be used in male-male fights, the lecturer makes the point that if antlers were used primarily for defense, the females would also have them, however, they don’t. Additionally many animals with antlers use their hooves for fighting and protection anyway. So while they are helpful in protection, they are not always an essential part of defense.
Lastly, the lecturer refutes the reading in the notion that males use their antlers as a show of virility. He explains that males actually use their voices to sing and attract females, rather than using the size of their antlers for attraction. Also, deer with smaller antlers do not always back down to ones with larger antlers. Although they are used in fights to win females, the victor is not always determined by the size of the antlers.
Therefore, the purpose of antlers is quite different in the lecturer’s perspective versus the reading. Antlers are not used for heat dissipation, they are not always used for defensive purposes, and they don’t always serve to show their strength and fertility.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 14
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Glass is one of the most popular materials for modern architecture. However it is also very dangerous for wild birds because it is difficult for them to distinguish the difference between open air and glass. As a result, millions of birds are harmed every year when they fly through glass windows. But there are a number of solutions that can be used to prevent injuries to birds from the businesses that are housed in those modern glass buildings.
The first solution is to replace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction. This ensures that the occupants can still see out of the building, but the birds cannot see in. Of course, if birds cannot see through a window, then they understand that the glass forms a solid barrier and won’t try to fly through it.
Another solution is to use colorful lines or designs on glass windows. If a window had thin stripes or a decorative pattern over the glass, the birds would actually avoid trying to fly through the glass. Meanwhile people would still be able to see through the windows, in the places the paint is not covering the windows. Architects can be encouraged to include colorful painted patterns on glass as part of the general design of buildings.
A third solution is by using a magnetic field. You can use an artificial magnetic field to guide birds away from buildings. A magnetic compass is an instrument that humans use to determine directions, such as north, west, east, or south. Bird research has shown that birds have a natural ability to sense Earth’s magnetic fields. This ability is similar to a compass. It helps birds with their sense of direction. They have the ability to navigate in the correct direction when they fly. If there is a building in the path of a bird’s flight, that building can be equipped with powerful electromagnets that emit magnetic signals that steer birds in a direction away from the building.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the use of glass and how it affects the birds. Whereas the author of the reading states that the glass used in the buildings is dangerous for the birds by providing three pieces of information to justify his point, the lecturer suggests that none of the claims made are effective and refutes each point. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, it is stated by replacing clear glass with one-way glass, the birds will distinguish the glass. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He states this by providing an example of one-way glass been used like a mirror where birds do not understand the concept of a mirror. Furthermore, he mentions that birds will confuse the image reflected on the window as a tree and will fly towards it resulting in them been injured.
Secondly, the reading states that by painting the glass in various colors can result in the birds distinguishing between what is a window and what is not. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. He argues this point by stating that that the birds will see the open spaces between the lines as holes and will fly right through them resulting in some sort of damage. In addition, he points out in order to solve this issue the windows should be designed with small open space but this can result in, the design of the building being too dark for people which therefore makes this design unacceptable.
Finally, the reading claims thatusing magnetic fields in the buildings will guide birds away from buildings. On the other hand, the lecturer casts doubt on this point and claims that the birds use magnetic fields as a way of direction on their long trips. He thinks that birds use their eyes or the brightness to fly a short distance, therefore magnetic fields will not work respectively.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about a solution of buildings containing glass that is related to the bird’s safety, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 15
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
There are creatures that utilize a unique biological function known as bioluminescence, or glowing in the dark. They have the ability to illuminate their bodies. Some scientists believe they use this feature to communicate. However, others believe it’s being used for hunting and attracting prey. Finally other scientists believe creatures use bioluminescence for camouflage and defense. Despite the theories, many mysteries exist concerning bioluminescence.
The first feature scientists noticed for bioluminescence is communication. Certain animals such as fireflies use colors and patterns to communicate with each other. By using light to communicate these animals express themselves over long distances in complete silence. Many believe that when animals use bioluminescence for communication the primary use is for mating. The light works the same way that bird plumage or animal calls attract mates.
On a different note, some animals use bioluminescence for hunting. Some animals use the light the way people use night vision goggles or flashlights. The light allows creatures to see in dark areas and hunt. Some animals use bioluminescence as an attraction to draw animals closer. Attracted by the light, some animals become easy prey for bioluminescent animals.
A complimentary idea to bioluminescence for hunting is for defense. Certain fish have been able to generate light to their advantage by glowing to blur their outline and make them a harder target for prey. Other animals release glowing light as an inky residue when they are attacked to distract their predator while they escape. Thus they use bioluminescence for defense.
All in all, the role of bioluminescence is more varied than other biological functions. Through this act of glowing, creatures communicate their needs and desires. Other animals are capable of hunting with greater ease, while others use their glowing as a means of defense and camouflage. Through tracking these varying uses scientists have been able to gain greater understanding of bioluminescence.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they address the specific ideas about bioluminescence described in the reading passage.
Both the reading passage and lecture combine to give a complete understanding of how bioluminescence works. Bioluminescence is when an animal can produce a glowing light from their body.
The reading explains that some creatures use this light for communication. The lecture goes on to explain that some animals in the oceans use light to signal to each other in the dark since they can’t see otherwise. It says that this has existed for millions of years.
Next the reading passage talked about the use for hunting. The lecture gives an example of animals that use the light to help them see other animals. Also, some animals use the light to distract creatures before attacking them while hunting.
The final example brought up in the reading was about defense. The lecture gives more examples of this use by talking about how lights can attract certain animals that feed on the surrounding creatures. Other fish use the light to scare away their predators.
Through all the examples presented in both the reading and the lecture it is obvious that there are many different uses for bioluminescence, but also many questions about its uses and origins.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 16
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Torreya taxifolia, once a very common evergreen tree in the state of Florida started to die out in the 1950s. If nothing is done soon, there is a possibility that Torreya could become extinct altogether because no one knows exactly what caused the trees to die out. In order to save Torreya from extinction, experts are considering three solutions.
The first solution is to reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years. Torreya used to be found in abundance in the northern part of Florida, which has a specific microclimate. When weather conditions inside a small area are different from the region it is a part of, then a microclimate exists. Northern Florida’s microclimate is very favorable to Torreya’s growth because it is cooler and wetter. Meanwhile the surrounding region has a very warm and dry climate. Scientists have been working to plant Torreya seeds in the dampest and coolest areas of the microclimate.
A second solution is to move Torreya far from its microclimate in Florida. Possibly move it to an entirely different location. In fact Torreya seeds and saplings have been successfully planted and grown in forests further north, where the temperature is significantly cooler. Some scientists believe that Torreya probably thrived in areas much further north in the distant past. They can use a process called assisted migration to help relocate the special evergreen trees. Humans would simply be helping Torreya return to an environment that is more suited to its survival.
The third solution is preserving Torreya in research centers. Seeds and saplings can be moved from the wild and preserved in a closely monitored environment where it will be easier for scientists both to protect the species and conduct research on Torreya. The research done in these centers can then be used to ensure the continued survival of the species, as well as, help to understand the factors that caused them to die out.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about three different ways to save the Torreya tree from extinction. Whereas the author of the reading states that the three points stated in the reading passage are an incorrect way of protecting this tree, the lecturer states that all three points stated in the passage are not sustainable. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, the first solution is to reinstate Torreya in the same place in Florida. However, the lecturer disputes this point. He says that the plantation of Torreya in a microclimate area such as Florida is inconceivable since it is the coolest and dampest region close to the hottest district. Furthermore, he mentions that climate change will impact the microclimate zone, along these lines, and inclement temperature that is linked to uninhabitable conditions in the dry origin.
Secondly, the reading states that moving them to a different location is one of the solutions to conserve them however the speaker disagrees with this point. He argues that by stating that the result will be similar to what happened when scientists moved the Black locust tree, which resulted in the tree spreading out at a faster pace that leads to the death of other endangered plants and trees in this new area.
Finally, the reading claims that moving Torreya to be preserved in research centers so that it could be closely monitored is a good idea but on the other hand, the lecturer believes that if Torreya was to be moved from the wild to a research center, the population would not be able to face any diseases that they encounter, since they are a genetically diverse population. He thinks that a preserved population will not be able to survive in the long term.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about saving Torreya, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 17
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Blood rain, or red rain, is a phenomenon in which blood appears to fall from the sky as rain. A recent occurrence of this was in Kerala, India, where blood rain fell for two months in 2001. up until the 17th century it was generally believed that red rain was actually blood and was a bad sign. In the 19th century scientific explanations were being explored. Three explanations for blood rain have emerged.
The first explanation is that ash from a volcano was blasted into the atmosphere and caused the rain to be red. This theory states that volcanic ash stays in the atmosphere for up to hundreds of miles before falling to the ground in rain. Because of the composition of the ash, the rain is stained red.
Another explanation is the sediments creating the red color were there as a result of a meteor explosion. Inhabitants of Kerala reported a bright flash of light and “thunder” like nothing they had ever heard. The meteor explosion would have produced the light, thunder, and enough matter to create the red rain.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture present information about the phenomenon of red rain. The reading presents information intended to explain red rain, whereas the professor points out areas where these explanations are lacking. The lecturer effectively refutes the information from the reading by providing three counterpoints.
First, the reading suggests an explanation which involves a volcanic ash turning the rain red. While the professor agrees that this idea is possible, he also casts doubt upon it. The lecturer states that the chemical properties of ash would also create acid rain. Moreover, he provides a contradictory example in which the red rain persisted beyond the few weeks that the ash was still present.
Next, the author in the reading argues that the red rain was a result of materials found in a meteor explosion, citing an account of a storm happening around the time of the red rain. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this, explaining that such a meteor would have affected a larger area than where the red rain was reported.
Lastly, the reading brings up lichens as a possible cause for the rain turning red. On the other hand, the professor argues against this point. He states that lichens form on the ground, and it would take a long time for them to reach the atmosphere. Furthermore, he feels that people would have taken notice if there were unusual red lichens growing on the ground.
In conclusion, while the reading attempts to explain the phenomenon of red rain, the lecturer is able to bring all three possible explanations proposed by the reading into question with his own counterpoints.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 18
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
A menhaden, also known as a mossbunker, bunker, and pogy, is any forage fish of the genera Brevoortia and Ethmidum of the family Clupeidae. Gulf menhaden and Atlantic menhaden are small oily-fleshed fish characterized by their bright silver color and a series of smaller spots behind the humeral spot. They are flat with soft flesh and a deeply forked tail, and they grow to a maximum of 15 inches long. According to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, the stock of menhaden is not considered overfished currently, there have been 32 instances of overfishing in the past 54 years. Paul Greenburg, the author of Four Fish: The Future of the Last Wild Food, has called for a fishing ban for menhaden in US federal waters and the Chesapeake bay due to the detrimental effects overfishing is having on the population, and in turn the menhaden’s predator populations and the water quality. However, a fishing ban is not the best course of action.
One factor that could be resulting in the reduced population of menhaden is the large population of striped bass. They are a culprit in the decline of the menhaden population because as their population grows they eat more fish including menhaden. This type of culprit would not be effected by placing restrictions on menhaden fishing.
Also, because menhaden are a food source for all animals, the prohibition of fishing menhaden would break a supply chain. Therefore by trying to protect menhaden through the prohibition of fishing it is really hurting the food supply for others.
Finally, if the government were to issue these harsh fishing restrictions, a lot of people would become unemployed. Those who depend on fishing menhaden for a living would not be able to maintain their livelihood if they are no longer able to fish for them.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecturer presents information concerning the proposed rules and regulations around fishing menhaden. While the article presents the argument that a ban on fishing menhaden is not a solution, the lecturer strongly disagrees and presents ideas refuting the reading.
First of all, the reading says the number of menhaden is falling because they are prey to striped bass. However, the lecturer explains that natural predators are a vital part of every ecosystem maintaining a natural balance. New rules will allow for this balance to be better monitored, and allow for a return to normal levels of fish in the waters.
Next the reading suggests that menhaden should not be banned from fishing because they are a vital source of food for livestock. The lecturer refutes this idea by suggesting that there are alternative sources of food. Given that menhaden are not the only source of food for livestock, new rules would not interfere with livestock production.
Finally, the reading brings up the point that fishermen will suffer because of fishing bans. While the lecturer acknowledges this as true, he beings up the point that this ban will be short-lived, and then the fishermen may be able to return to fishing menhaden with new regulations. He also proposes a switch in the type of fish they seek as a means of alternative income.
All in all, the lecturer provides alternative reasons for why a fishing ban would be good for menhaden. It would help rebalance the natural structure of the food chain. In the process farmers would have to find alternative feed, and the fishermen would have to seek out a different fish, but none of this is insurmountable.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 19
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Wildlife crossings are structures built to allow animals to cross human-made barriers safely. These crossings promote habitat conservation by allowing connections and reconnections between habitats to avoid habitat fragmentation. They also lower instances of collisions between animals and vehicles that cause injury, and sometimes death, to both wildlife and humans. While the conservation benefits created by these structures are a priority of several groups, they are not as useful as they seem.
First of all, animals cannot train themselves to use crossings like we do. If the animals cannot make use of the crossings, the crossings are considered useless. Also, research suggests that animals living in the wild are often reluctant to cross these crossings to mingle with other populations.
Secondly, because the crossings are useless, they become a waste of financial resources. Wildlife crossing includes structures such as underpass tunnels, viaducts, overpasses, amphibian tunnels, fish ladders, and green roofs. Each of these structures requires money to build, but because of the uselessness of the structures they become just another financial waste for the country building them.
And finally, the developed areas that create the wildlife crossings are damaged and prevent wild animals from reproducing. While loss of habitat, road kill, and isolation from resources exert pressure on various animal populations by reducing available resources and killing individuals in the populations, Bennet (1991) found that road kills do not pose a significant threat to healthy populations and are only devastating to threatened populations.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture present opposing arguments concerning the value of constructing crossings for animals to safely pass over man-made structures. The reading takes the position that the crossings are not beneficial to animals, whereas the lecturer believes that crossings for wildlife are useful. The lecturer provides three reasons which challenge those stated in the reading.
First, while the reading states that animals do not understand how to successfully use new bridges and tunnels, the lecturer presents an alternative position. He explains that animals adapt to their surroundings. Furthermore, he believes that there will be a spike in the number of animals utilizing these structures over time as they learn how to do so.
Second, the author in the reading points out that these construction projects are extremely expensive. On the other hand, the professor refutes this by indicating that the damage caused to property from collisions with animals is even greater. Additionally, he says that the price of protecting wildlife, including endangered animals, is worth paying.
Finally, rather than hindering reproduction as is described in the reading, the lecturer believes that these crossings promote reproduction. Moreover, he states that this improves the overall lives of the animals.
In conclusion, the reading and the lecture both concern whether or not constructing these animal crossings is worthwhile. While author in the reading opposes the crossings, the lecturer effectively refutes three of the reasons as stated in the reading.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 20
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
One of the latest resources found on the internet is the communal online encyclopedia. These encyclopedias are, in many ways, like the traditional printed encyclopedias containing collections of articles on various subjects. The unique feature of the online encyclopedias is that any internet user can add a new article or make an editorial change to an existing one. This results in an encyclopedia authored by the entire internet community. While this sounds like a good idea, communal encyclopedias have several important issues that make them less reliable than the traditional printed encyclopedia.
First, the contributors from the online community often lack academic credentials resulting in partially informed or inaccurate information. On the other hand, traditional encyclopedias are written by trained experts following a rigorous academic standard that non-specialists cannot really achieve.
Second, the communal nature of these online encyclopedias provide the opportunity for dishonest individuals to fabricate, delete, and corrupt information in the encyclopedia. After the changes are made it is impossible to tell the entry was tampered with. This isn’t possible with traditional encyclopedias.
Finally, the communal encyclopedias focus more frequently on popular topics giving them the appearance of equal importance to an important historical event. This can give someone like a child doing a research project for school the misconception of how important a topic truly is. In a traditional encyclopedia, there is a considered view of what topics should be included or excluded and a sense of proportion not found in communal encyclopedias.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage
The reading and the lecture both concern online encyclopedias. Whereas the author of the reading states that online encyclopedias are flawed informational resources, the lecturer disagrees. The lecturer casts doubt each of the three criticisms from the reading with his own reasons.
First, the author of the reading addresses errors found in online encyclopedias. While the lecturer admits that online encyclopedias have mistakes, he argues that traditional encyclopedias are also imperfect. He then brings up the point that online encyclopedias are corrected more easily than traditional ones.
Secondly, the reading states that online encyclopedias are vulnerable to problematic changes made by online users. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes by arguing that online encyclopedias have already taken preventative steps to prevent unauthorized changes from being made. In addition, he points out that there are already specialists hired to monitor online content for malicious changes.
Third, the lecturer challenges the final point in the reading about the importance of determining which information is presented in online encyclopedias. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that this is less of a concern. He claims that the amount of space online allows for the a greater variety of topics to be included. Moreover, he says this wide variety of available subjects reflects the genuine interests of society.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the worth of online encyclopedias, the lecturer makes arguments against all three main points from the reading.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 21
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
An international organization has started issuing certifications to wood companies who meet a high ecological standard by conserving resources and recycling materials in an effort to encourage ecological sustainable forestry practices. Certified companies can attract customers by advertising their products as eco-certified. Many wood companies around the world have adopted eco-friendly practices in order to receive the eco-certification; however, it is unlikely that United States’s wood companies will do the same for several reasons.
First, due to the high levels of advertising American consumers are exposed to they would not pay attention to the eco-certification label. Americans have lost their trust in advertising claims because of how many mediocre products have been labeled as new or improved.
Second, the costs a wood company pays to have their business examined by a certification agency will drive the prices higher than uncertified wood. The American consumer is typically motivated by price and they are more likely to purchase the cheaper, uncertified, wood product instead. Therefore, American companies would prefer to keep their prices low instead of obtaining eco-certification.
Third, the claim that it always makes good business sense for American companies to keep up with the rest of the world’s developments is not a convincing argument. If American wood companies marketed to a global client base it would be reasonable to argue for the eco-certification, but that is not the case. Most of the American wood business’ products are sold in the United States and has a very large customer base that is satisfied with their products.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The lecture and author of the reading passage offer contradicting views on eco-certification. The passage states that it is not necessary for American wood companies to pursue eco-certification, whereas the lecturer provides three points to refute this stance.
First, the author of the reading passage claims that Americans ignore labels on eco-certification. However, the lecturer feels that this approach to how American consumers view advertising is too general, as it does not take the source of the claim into account. He then explains that American consumers do trust advertisements from independent certification agencies.
Second, information in the reading suggests that American consumers react negatively to price increases from eco-certification. Nevertheless, the lecturer also refutes this, explaining that though American consumers are price-sensitive, it does not mean they will choose cheap wood over eco-certified wood. The professor argues that a price difference would not necessarily dissuade consumers from choosing eco-friendly products.
Finally, the reading explains that American companies are not interested in selling to a global market. On the other hand, the lecturer believes that receiving the eco-certification is an important strategy for American wood companies to ensure they can compete against similar eco-friendly products imported from abroad. Moreover, he thinks that American consumers do, in fact, care about the environment.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture both question the importance of eco-certification, the lecturer successfully challenges all of the author’s three main points.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 22
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Despite the obvious advantages of technology, social media has generated highly negative consequences. To begin with, social media has created a false sense of connectivity and friendship. Additionally, social media has encouraged new forms of harassment through cyber-bullying. One last result of social media is a decrease in overall productivity. These negative attributes make social media a dangerous and controversial set of tools.
The first negative consequence of social media is a false sense of connectedness. People feel a sense of belonging when they can log onto the Internet and see the people they can talk to. Unfortunately, despite the number of people everyone can connect with, there are lower standards for what constitutes a friend. Relationships are casual online interactions rather than legitimate friendships.
Another consequence of social media is the creation of cyber-bullying. People in all age groups now find themselves the object of scorn and derision through message boards. In online interactions, people don’t fear to say things because they don’t have to do so in person. This unfortunate byproduct can have dreadful repercussions for both bullies and the bullied.
Finally, social media has become a distraction and decreased productivity. Students doing homework are likely to be pulled towards scouring social media to check on their friends. Rather than pursuing hobbies, people are more likely to spend time pursuing artificial relationships they established online. Social media has ultimately provided a source of addicting distraction that has turned the world into unproductive workers.
Thus when all factors are considered, the presence of social media has simply brought about too many negative repercussions for people. It has replaced genuine relationships with impersonal interactions. It has introduced a new and almost unpunishable form of bullying. Also, it has become a distraction, turning people into unproductive workers. The snowball effect of negative repercussions is astounding when examined in unison.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they address the specific concerns about social media described in the reading passage.
Through the reading and the lecture there are many negative consequences of social media presented. Both give many examples to help support the same idea.
First they mention that social media destroys relationships. In both the reading and the lecture they show that people have begun to put more value on computer based relationships rather than real life ones. They frame this idea as people losing touch with the real world and losing genuine relationships.
Next, they both propose that another negative consequence of social media is cyber-bullying. This is when someone uses the internet to tease or harass someone, oftentimes anonymously. The lecture talks about how this is dangerous because people are willing to say things they wouldn’t say in public and they think that there are no consequences of doing so.
Finally, the reading and lecture take a look at productivity. They both use examples to show how social media is a huge distraction for people. Instead of doing work or homework, people use social media to distract them from their obligations. The lecture suggests that this has cost some businesses billions of dollars in lost revenue.
In conclusion, the reading and lecture use a wide variety of examples to support their thoughts that social media is a bad thing. The many negatives of social media are almost overwhelming.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 23
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
In several organizations the best way to approach certain new projects is by establishing a team of individuals. There are several advantages to teamwork when completing a project.
One of the advantages of teamwork is the wider range of knowledge, skills, and expertise brought to the situation by having multiple individuals involved. Everyone is unique and has different skills, backgrounds and experiences. Therefore, others in a team can help an individual see things from a different angle.
Also, teamwork enables a group of individuals to respond more quickly to their assigned task and come up with creative solutions to problems. The projects will be completed more quickly because there are more resources in a group than an individual would have access to. Creative solutions are more likely to come about because teamwork spreads the responsibility for a decision to all of the members . This means that no single individual will feel as if they are solely responsible for a wrong decision.
Finally, being a member of a team can be very rewarding for the individual. Team members will understand the processes they are involved in instituting which will make them more comfortable with carrying out the work. In addition, individual team members have a better opportunity to get their contributions and ideas recognized as highly significant. This is because a team’s overall results are likely to have a greater impact than would have been accomplished by an individual.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the effects of teamwork. Whereas the author of the reading states that the effects of teamwork are generally positive, the lecturer suggests that teamwork may not be as rewarding. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First, the passage indicates that teamwork grants individuals in groups recognition for their contributions. However, the lecturer refutes this by explaining that team-members who did little work received the same level of recognition. This contradicts the positive outcome predicted by the reading passage.
Second, in the reading passage, it states that groups will work more quickly with more resources available. The speaker refutes this with the results of the firm’s experiment. In the experiment, the groups are slower than individuals because they need more time for meetings to make a decision.
Third, the reading discusses influential members of the group as having a positive effect overall. However, the lecturer casts doubt upon this by discussing cases where the influential member is headed in the wrong direction. If so, other members probably won’t be able to change the group’s direction, making them less successful.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the effects of teamwork, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 24
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Employees in the United States typically work five eight-hour days per week; however, many employees would prefer to work four days per week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so.
Creating a mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of a four-day workweek at 80 percent of their normal pay would benefit the economy, the individual companies and their employees who take the option. The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert resulting in fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of their normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, and would increase company profits.
The primary benefit to the economy by offering this option would be a reduction in unemployment rates. If several full-time employees started working fewer hours, employers would have to shift some of their workload to another employee. For every four employees who worked an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate to pick up the extra work created by the shorter week of the other employees.
Finally, a four-day workweek would improve the quality of life for the individual employees who could afford a lower salary. By reducing their hours at work, employees would have the ability to spend more time with their families, pursue private interests, or enjoy leisure activities.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading passage and the lecture concern the possibility of a four day work-week.The reading passage argues that a four-day workweek will benefit companies, the economy, and individuals, yet the lecturer opposes this stance this with three counterpoints.
First, the reading passage says companies will receive greater profits from the four-day workweek by creating more effective employees, but the lecture points out that the shorter workweek will lead to more spending. He states that increased spending will result from increased company costs.
Second, the reading passage claims that the four-day workweek will reduce unemployment rates and improve the economy. The lecturer refutes this claim by pointing out that even with more jobs being added, companies would prefer to let employees work overtime, stating that it costs less to pay overtime than it would to hire more people. Furthermore, he feels companies may expect of their staff to finish five-day jobs in four days.
Finally, the reading passage suggests that individual employees would benefit from the shorter week. While the shorter week might provide employees with more leisure time, the lecturer argues it may harm their quality of life. Additionally, the lecturer concludes that four-day workers may be more likely to be laid off during an economic depression. Moreover, he believes they will have fewer chances for promotion.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the question of whether implementing a four day work-week would be a positive change. However, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 25
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Lake Powell is a reservoir on the Colorado River that straddles the border between Utah and Arizona, and it is the second largest man-made reservoir in terms of maximum capacity storing 24,322,000 acre feet of water when full. Lake Powell was created by the flooding of Glen Canyon by the Glen Canyon Dam, which also led to the creation of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, and is a popular summer destination that approximately 2 million people visit every year. The lake is an important resource for the economy of local towns and the environment. This is just the first of many reasons Lake Powell should not be drained.
The lake is a tourist attraction that allows visitors to go boating in the water and is a substantial source of revenue. Glen Canyon National Recreation Area was established in 1972 on public land and is managed by the National Park Service. If the lake was drained it would damage the revenue of the surrounding area.
Lake Powell also supplies water for the surrounding area and is the largest reservoir in terms of the amount of water currently held, depth, and surface area. It is a water storage facility for the Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact (Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, and New Mexico), and regulations within the Compact specify that the Upper Basin states are required to provide a minimum annual flow of 7,500,000 acre-feet to the Lower Basin states (Arizona, Nevada, and California).
There are also several fish species that reside in the lake including some species that are on the US Endangered Species List. Currently most of the native species on the Colorado River Basin are part of ongoing restoration efforts and the influx of bass if Lake Powell were to be drained could interfere with these efforts.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
While acknowledging the truth to many of the claims made in the reading, the lecturer seeks to present alternative arguments in favor of draining Lake Powell. His arguments take the same ideas and present alternative perspectives on those.
The first argument presented in the reading was that the area is a huge tourist attraction. The lecturer presents the alternative thought that the dam filled a vast beautiful canyon that if drained would then become a tourist attraction in itself. He goes so far as to even suggest that this canyon area would be a larger tourist attraction than the current lake, proving the local economy with a boost rather than a bane.
Second, while the lake undeniably provides the western states with a vast amount of water, the lecturer argues that the amount of water lost is substantial. He points out that the warm weather causes much evaporation. Also, the porous rocks allow for vast amounts of water to be lost by seepage. Therefore, he tries to allude to the idea that there may be better ways to contain water without losing so much to natural problems.
Finally, despite the remarks in the reading about the protection of fish in Lake Powell, the lecturer presents environmental problems with the lake. He explains that the dam causes silt buildup that is slowing the flow of the river and reducing the amount of water flow. He also points out that the draining of the lake is supported by environmental organizations.
In conclusion, the lecturer points out some oppositional arguments to the support the reading presents. The lake could be an ideal tourist attraction when drained. The dam loses vast amounts of water and reduces the river flow anyway, so the dam could be decommissioned with some definite positives.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 26
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Chevalier de Seingalt (1725–1798) recounted his life and adventures in a long memoir written toward the end of his life. the Chevalier was a controversial figure, but because of the people he met, his memoir became a valuable historical source about eighteenth century European society. However, the accuracy of the memoir has been brought into question by critics claiming that the Chevalier distorted or invented events to make his life seem more glamorous than it was.
One point brought into question was that, in his memoir, he Chevalier claims he was very wealthy while living in Switzerland. While it was known he spent large amounts of money on parties and gambling there, evidence has recently surfaced showing that the Chevalier borrowed large sums from a Swiss merchant. Critics argue that because of his need for borrowing money he could not have really been very rich.
Critics also question the accuracy of the conversations the Chevalier records in his memoir between himself and the famous writer Voltaire. There is no doubt that these two men met and conversed; however, critics state that it is impossible for the conversations to accurately be captured because they were recorded many years after they occurred. Critics point out that exact phrases from the extended conversation held years before are impossible to remember.
Another disputed event is the Chevalier’s account of his escape from a notorious prison in Venice, Italy. The Chevalier claims he used a piece of metal to make a hole in the ceiling and climb out of his cell. Critics argue that, while it makes for an enjoyable reading, it is more likely that the jailers were bribed to free him. They note that the Chevalier had many politically well-connected friends in Venice capable of offering a bribe.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading passage and lecture cover Chevalier de Seingalt’s autobiographical memoir. While the author of the reading passage questions the memoir’s accuracy, the lecturer provides three reasons to defend the memoir.
First, the reading brings up evidence that the Chavalier was in debt, meaning he could not have been wealthy. The professor refutes this, explaining that the Chevalier was rich in assets, but occasionally borrowed funds. According to the professor, being low on cash funds is not the same as being financially poor.
Second, the reading states that the memoir is fraudulent in light of the Chevalier’s claimed ability to remember exact conversations with Voltaire. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that the Chevalier’s habit of recording each conversation with Voltaire explains his ability to recall those discussions in detail. Moreover, the lecturer feels that this has been confirmed by those who knew the Chevalier.
Finally, the author believes that the Chevalier’s retelling of his incredible prison escape is fictitious, and that bribery is the more likely explanation. On the other hand, the professor refutes this idea of bribery. He says even very wealthy prisoners were often unable to successfully bribe their way out. Additionally, the lecturer notes the existence of some government papers as strong evidence that the Chevalier’s escape having been recorded.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about the validity of the Chevalier’s memoir, the lecturer effectively disputes all the three of the main points made in the reading.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 27
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
The first reason was their large armies that occupied the lands of other countries. These armies were made up of captives forced to serve in the army and by the professional soldiers of the Imperial Roman army. Professional soldiers volunteered for 20 years of active service followed by five years of reserve duty. This was a definite shift from the material of the former republic in which an army of conscripts exercised their responsibilities as citizen to protect their homeland in specific campaigns against specific threats, whereas Imperial Rome’s army was a full-time career.
The second reason for the Roman Empire’s rise to power was the power held by the monarchs. This state of the absolute monarchy began with Diocletian and endured until the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE. The authority of the emperor was based on the consolidation of several of the republican offices. The emperor had powers of inviolability of the tribunes of the people, authority of the censors to manipulate the hierarchy of Roman society, central religious authority as Pontifex Maximus, the right to declare war, ratify treaties, and negotiate with foreign leaders. These functions were clearly defined during the Principate, but over time the emperor’s powers became less constitutional and more monarchical creating the dominate.
Finally, the high taxes placed on their empire helped to make the empire richer. The taxes an individual paid ranged from 2 to 5 percent of the gross product. The bewildering tax code involved a complicated system of direct and indirect taxes as well as taxes paid in cash and some paid in kind. The taxes might be specific to a province, property, or in effect for a limited time. The Roman Empire justified their tax collection as a necessary cost to maintain the military; however, taxpayers sometimes received a refund if the army obtained a surplus of booty. Less monetized areas that were unable to pay their taxes in cash were allowed to pay in-kind especially if they could supply grain of goods to the army camps.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
In considering what exactly made the Roman Empire powerful, the lecturer questions the information presented in the reading. While he agrees that much of the reasoning is accurate, he takes a different interpretation to how each of those categories gave the empire power.
To begin with, although the empire derived much of its power from its military force, the reading was misleading in that not all soldiers were Romans. While the military conquered lots of land for the empire, many soldiers were from those conquered lands, and as loyalties waned the government would have to restructure the military. In this way they ensured that their power was unchecked by the soldiers.
The second questionable source of power was in the form of the holder of power. While the reading suggests the emperor held monarchical powers, the lecturer suggests that the ruler’s power came not through their undisputed role, but through their control of the military. This led to power struggles whenever a leader died as power seekers vied for the support of the military as the path to power. This led to bribing and paying off of military leaders to gain support.
Another section of dispute came in their views about how taxes were used to increase wealth. While the lecturer agrees that taxes were a source of revenue, he argues that this came initially through taxing wealthy landowners. However, as time went on and they needed more money, they began taxing everyone, leading to discontent and eventually the downfall of the empire.
In conclusion, the lecturer shows how these ideas, while correct in their inception, were not interpreted correctly. Rome’s power came through their military, while being kept in check. The lecturer also believed that one initial source of power eventually led to the downfall of the empire.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 28
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Many people have heard of the Great Depression, but what caused this economic downturn? One of the great signifiers of the beginning was the Stock Market Crash of 1929. With that came the disaster of thousands of banks collapsing through the 1930’s. With the failure of financial institutions came a reduction in personal spending. These three factors helped bring about this awful disaster.
In the beginning came Black Tuesday 1929. That day the value of shares in the Stock Market plummeted, causing people to lose fortunes. Within two months shareholders lost nearly 40 billion dollars. With no end in sight the country braced itself for the eventual repercussions of major companies and wealthy citizens losing so much capital in such a short time.
Following the market crash came trickling effects of this disaster. Throughout the 1930’s, 9,000 banks failed. This means that any bank that overstretched itself through loans could declare bankruptcy. Any person with funds in that bank would simply lose their entire life savings. Also, people stopped investing their money in banks, and banks stopped offering loans creating a series of continued problems.
A final cause came because of this lack of personal and commercial investment. Whether because of a loss of personal finances or a lack of commercial options, people stopped buying things. Without money to buy things the market continued its downward spiral, bringing banks and personal finances with it. This lack of personal spending perpetuated the problem of dwindling market values.
In the end the causes of the Great Depression were byproducts of each other. Starting with problems of an overextended market that crashed and died quickly over a few months, the spiral began. From there the failure of banks coupled with a lack of purchasing destroyed exchanging finances. Thus the United States created and endured the greatest financial disaster of the world.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they address the specific reasons for the Great Depression described in the reading passage.
The reading passage explains the multiple factors that caused the Great Depression. The lecture then built upon those same ideas to give a more comprehensive picture.
First, the market crashed in 1929 caused by millions of shares being traded. This made the stocks eventually worthless and aside from the one day losses, created an overall loss of millions of dollars. The loss of money also caused businesses to fail which led to high unemployment.
Next, the failing businesses led to the collapse of the banks. Banks offered loans to many people. When people couldn’t pay those back, the banks lost money. However, since the banks had loaned out the money in the first place, they lost all the money that people had invested. So many people lost everything they had.
Finally, the government created more problems. Since they wanted people to buy things they made laws about not bringing in foreign items. But since the businesses all failed, there was nothing being made in America and so nothing to buy. That means people didn’t have basic things they needed.
Thus the reading and the lecture created a comprehensive understanding of all the factors that led to the Great Depression.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 29
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Folic acid, or folate, is one of 12 B vitamins and is especially important to women who are pregnant or attempting to become pregnant. It has been shown that adequate folate ingestion during the preconception period helps protect against several congenital malformations such as neural tube defects. Neural tube defects are severe abnormalities of the central nervous system that develops in the first few weeks of embryo development and can result in malformations of the spine, skull, and brain. The most common neural tube defects are spina bifida and anencephaly. Because of this risk to the health of the embryo, pregnant women especially need proper amounts of folic acid and as a result it has been proposed that folic acid should be added to bread and other flour products to avoid this problem. However there are problems that could arise from this measure and it would not solve all of the current problems.
First, even if the folic acid was added to items like bread, women, even a young woman, would not be able to receive an adequate amount of it through a typical diet. The amount of folic acid women would receive would vary greatly depending on the type of diet they maintained. This method would not be a reliable way to solve the problem of pregnant women not receiving adequate amounts of it early in the pregnancy.
Also, by adding extra things to food, it can have adverse effects on the elderly. The addition of folic acid to everyday foods could be dangerous to the elderly community because they generally take supplements that add 400 micrograms (μg) to their daily folic acid intake. Adding folic acid to their daily food would increase this amount to more dangerous levels causing them to have higher levels of unmetabolized folic acid which can accelerate the growth of preneoplastic lesions.
And finally, tablets that add folic acid to the diet of pregnant women are readily available. The levels of folic acid in these tablets are only suitable for pregnant women and guarantee they receive the proper amount when used.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage
While the lecturer acknowledges the truth behind the need for pregnant women to consume higher levels of folic acid, he disagrees with the methods by which they should get that boost. He believes the method of putting folic acid in bread would be a good way to ensure that pregnant women receive their needed doses.
To begin with, he believes that despite what the article says, women would eat more bread while pregnant. The reading mentions that women, especially young women, might have varying diets that influence how much they eat. The lecturer sees this as not practical because women will do what they need to receive the proper amounts of folic acid while pregnant.
Second, the lecturer tackles the notion that increased folic acid in bread would be bad for the elderly, who can acquire lesions from unmetabolized folic acid in their blood. He explains that there is much unknown information about how much folic acid is harmful to people. Most folic acid is flushed from people’s systems through urination and makes diseases related to excess folic acid a low risk. The health risks of folic acid are simply unsubstantiated.
Third, the lecturer responds to the notion that excess folic acid is necessary during the early stages of pregnancy. While this is true, he points out that many women may be unaware they’re pregnant during the early stages. Therefore, they would have no way of ensuring they are getting the doses they need.
In conclusion, the lecturer points out reasons for supporting putting extra folic acid in bread. He believes that women will adjust their diets to meet this intake, or have greater intake even when they don’t know they’re pregnant. Additionally, the risks posed to others, especially the elderly, would be negligible, making this idea a good one.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 30
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Car manufacturers and governments have eagerly been seeking a replacement for the internal combustion engine as an automobile’s main source of power. The most promising alternative source is currently the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine which uses electricity created by hydrogen to power the car. There are several advantages to fuel-cell engines over the internal-combustion engine and will probably replace them soon.
The main problem with internal-combustion engines is that they rely on petroleum. Petroleum is a finite resource. At some point in the future, the supply of oil in the Earth’s crust will be exhausted. On the other hand, fuel-cell engines use hydrogen fuel for motive power. Hydrogen cannot easily be depleted and is found in various plentiful resources including natural gas and water. This makes hydrogen fuel cells a better environmentally-friendly alternative to conventional fossil fuels.
Also, fuel-cell engines are particularly attractive as an alternative power source for cars because they will solve several of the world’s pollution problems. By oxidising molecular hydrogen, the only direct by-product of their energy generation is water, which means they could significantly reduce pollution and man-made greenhouse gases. On the other hand, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and hydrocarbons are released when fuel is burned in an internal combustion engine.
Finally, fuel-cell engines will become economically competitive due to the reduced cost of operating them. A fuel-cell automobile is almost twice as efficient at fuel use as an internal-combustion automobile. This means that it only requires half of the fuel energy to go the same distance as an internal-combustion powered car.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the lecture discuss alternative fuel sources, namely, hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines. While the reading claims that this fuel source is advantageous, the lecturer identifies several issues with the use of hydrogen and provides three reasons as to why it is not a good choice.
First, in the reading, hydrogen is described as an attractive resource because it is an infinite supply of energy. However, the lecturer argues that due to the technological challenges of both obtaining and storing hydrogen, it is impractical to replace internal-combustion engines with fuel-cell engines.
Second, the reading makes a claim about hydrogen being environmentally-friendly. The lecturer refutes this. He says that even though fuel-cell engines would produce less pollution, the hydrogen manufacturing process would generate pollution when purifying the hydrogen. Moreover, he feels that this would not solve long-term problems with pollution.
Finally, while the author of the reading argues that the fuel-efficient hydrogen-based engines will cost less to operate, the professor refutes this concept. He cites the extremely expensive materials required to manufacture the engine, such as platinum, as being the source of the expense. Furthermore, he states that past attempts to replace materials this way have not been successful.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about alternative fuel sources, the three main points made in the reading about the benefits of using hydrogen-based fuel-cell engines are challenged by the lecturer’s counterpoints.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 31
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Over time partially decayed vegetation or organic matter can develop a natural area called a peat land or mire. The layers of decayed vegetation or organic matter create a type of turf called peat. The ecosystem created in these peat lands is the most efficient carbon sink on the planet because the peat land plants capture the CO2 (carbon dioxide) that is naturally released from the peat to maintain the equilibrium in the environment. However, there have been plans to build wind turbines in the peat lands of Scotland. A wind turbine is a device that converts the kinetic energy produced by the wind into electrical power. While this would be ecologically beneficial to create power, it would be harmful to the Scotsman’s economy and to the peat lands.
First of all, building turbines in the peat lands of Scotland would hurt the local tourism industry which is recognized as a key contributor to the Scottish community. The Scottish Parliament Information Centre (SPICe) published a briefing in 2002 for the Scottish Parliament’s Enterprise and Life Long Learning Committee stating that tourism accounted for up to 5% of GDP and 7.5% of employment. The destruction caused in the peat lands would also hurt production of certain Scotch whisky distilleries who use peat fires to dry the malted barley giving their whiskies a distinctive smoky flavor called “peatiness”.
Also, the release of the buried greenhouse gases that would occur in the process of demolishing the peat lands would be more environmentally unfriendly than the current methods used to produce electricity. This is because of the high concentration of CO2 captured by the plants in the peat lands.
Finally, there are alternative options that would spare the peat lands in Scotland such as building offshore in a shallow sea area. Building in this alternative location, many species of fauna and flora specific to peat wetland environments would be protected. It takes centuries for a peat box to recover from being disturbed so any destruction would be felt for a long time.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the point made in the lecture and explain how the speaker cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the prospect of building wind turbines on the peat lands in Scotland. Whereas the author of the reading states that building the turbines would be harmful, the lecturer suggests that the wind turbines will not be detrimental. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that wind turbines will have negative influences on the tourism industry. However, the lecturer refutes this by explaining that nature lovers generally prefer clean environmentally friendly energy. Additionally, he mentions that while the turbines would limit certain spaces in the peat lands, visitors could still travel to these areas.
The second claim in the reading states that building turbines on peat lands will release greenhouse gases, hurting the environment. The lecturer explains the amount of CO2 released will be minimal compared to the amounts produced by the continual use of fossil fuels. The wind turbines will occupy a small amount of space and allow for the peat lands to continue absorbing CO2, while simultaneously reducing our need of fossil fuels.
Lastly, the reading discusses a proposal to build these wind turbines in shallow coastal waters as being a possibility. On the other hand, the lecturer claims that this idea would alter wind patterns crossing the land and cause potentially drastic changes to the local weather. Moreover, he feels that this action would result in expensive damage.
In conclusion, although the reading and the lecture are both about building wind turbines in the Scottish peatlands, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 32
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
The coal industry has had a large environmental impact from land use, waste management, water and air pollution caused by coal mining, processing, and using coal. Not only does it cause atmospheric pollution, but coal burning also produces millions of tons of solid waste products. Burning coal comes with severe health effects and is estimated to shorten approximately 1,000,000 lives worldwide every year. The following are three methods for reducing the pollution produced by coal burning.
One method is to improve the reaction efficiency. By improving the reaction efficiency, air pollution can be reduced. It will not be an immediate impact, but over the long term it will have a significant impact.
Another method is to use water to flush the coal and remove sulfides to prevent the creation of sulfur dioxide. This would help to reduce the level of pollution created by the sulfides reacting with the air.
A third method is to collect the emitted carbon dioxide. This would prevent the gases from reaching the atmosphere. Pollution levels from carbon dioxide would drop significantly over time as this technology is expanded.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific solutions presented in the reading passage
Both the reading and the lecture concern the impact of burning coal. The reading passage explains that burning coal causes great harm to humans and the planet, and it suggests some ways that we could curb that impact. However, the professor in the lecture attempts to demonstrate some flaws in that thinking based on three pieces of conflicting information.
First, the reading suggests that by improving the reaction efficiency, the amount of pollution produced by burning coal would lessen over time. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that while improving the reaction efficiency would perhaps lower the emission of carbon dioxide, it actually would increase the production of solid waste byproducts. He feels that this is still a form of pollution.
The next suggestion in the reading is to limit the amount of emitted pollution by flushing coal and removing sulfide. However, the lecturer indicates that this would require moving this pollution from the atmosphere to the waterways, which increases acidification of the ecosystem and is equally harmful.
The final idea presented in the reading to make improvements to existing technology which collects carbon dioxide released by burning coal, and the lecturer mostly agrees. Nevertheless, the professor also says that this technology does not yet exist. Moreover, he believes that this still does not effectively address what happens to carbon dioxide once it is collected.
Although both the reading and the lecture present the many problems caused by burning coal, neither one effectively proposes a solution to this problem. The reading presents three ideas, but the lecturer refutes each of those ideas.
TOEFL writing Integrated Task Sample 33
Reading Passage (Reading time: 3 minutes)
Despite the wonder of nuclear energy, there remain too many disadvantages to utilizing it. First, the waste produced through nuclear energy offsets the benefits. Secondly, manufacturing comes at a high price to the health of the entire planet. Finally, the high cost of manufacturing and continual production is not feasible within most economies. These various disadvantages weigh heavily against an argument for nuclear energy.
A concern for nuclear energy is disposing of hazardous waste. Nuclear energy produces millions of gallons of radioactive waste that needs to be disposed of properly. This waste, if leached into ground water, the air, or people’s yards, can have deadly consequences for all creatures. So not only is the waste itself an issue, but the disposal of that waste has further disadvantages.
As a consequence of radioactive waste, we should be concerned about the biological consequences. In our time of nuclear energy production, there have been numerous nuclear catastrophes. Some were small-scale and others were large disasters. Even with minimal exposure, nuclear radiation and waste can cause vomiting, diarrhea, or cancer. Major problems take centuries to clean up during which people lose their homes, their health, and their livelihood.
A final disadvantage to nuclear energy is the high cost. On top of the initial cost, nuclear energy reactors also require immense legal fees. Also, construction can take up to a decade, which further complicates the process costs. An additional cost is the uranium needed for a nuclear reaction. This is far beyond the power of most countries or investors to acquire.
Nuclear energy, therefore, has many disadvantages. In the process of creating energy, radioactive waste is created and must be disposed of properly. When not created safely, or when waste is not disposed of properly, nuclear energy poses an immense danger to the planet. The cost of production and safety is too high anyway. Overall, nuclear energy should not be an option for energy production.
Transcript of the lecture:
Question:
Summarize the points in the lecture, being sure to explain how they address the specific concerns about nuclear energy described in the reading passage.
In this instance the reading and the lecture are discussing the many negative consequences of nuclear energy. Although they both mention that there are positives, they quickly say that the negatives outweigh the positives.
From the reading, the first problem with nuclear energy is the radioactive waste. The lecture then goes on to explain that the radioactive material leaches toxins into the atmosphere that take hundreds of years to leave. It also goes on to show that this waste gets into our soil, water, and thus poses a big danger.
Second, the reading brings up the point that overexposure to nuclear materials can cause major diseases. Supporting this idea, the lecture uses examples from previous nuclear disasters to explain how those caused many diseases, mutations, and even deaths. They both present this danger as devastating.
The final idea presented in the reading and supported by the lecture are the financial costs of nuclear energy. They both present information about how much it costs to build the facilities. However, the lecture also mentions the difficulty in getting the natural resources for creating nuclear energy. Overall it’s a lot of money.
In conclusion, both the reading and the lecture believe that the negatives are far greater than the positives when it comes to nuclear energy. Also, they present many layers of information to support their ideas.